Announcements
Even though I have separate sections on Competition and Predation in the course, I don't have one on Mutualism. Mutualism is important ecologically, but often each mutualism is important for a different reason. Mutualisms are often very specific for the types of organisms that are involved. Because mutualism is caused by co-evolution, a lot of them have their own idiosyncrasies that don't generalize easily to a way of explaining the overall things that are common to mutualisms. This is a contrast to Competition and Predation where there are a lot of features common to the interactions between very different pairs of species.

Community – collection of species that occur at the same place & time, circumscribed by natural (e.g., serpentine soil), arbitrary, or artificial (e.g., 1-m2 quadrat) boundaries

An ecological community is a set of interacting species which utilize the same environment.
Community – an association of interacting species inhabiting a defined area whose interactions can be + or - & direct or indirect.

How are groupings of species distributed in nature? (e.g., diversity)
How are these groupings explained by the environment and the interactions between and among species?
alpha, beta, and gamma diversity

One of the most common measurement is species richness, the number of species in a community

What is the species richness for both communities?
Impossible to count all species
Need to estimate based on sampling (quadrats, plots, transects, traps, etc.)
Richness depends on number of samples collected
More samples → more species


Use extrapolation to predict richness
Individual-based and sample-based
Procedures of individual-based rarefaction
Use rarefaction to compare diversity between two sites with different sampling effort

underlying community is constant over time (no immigration or emigration of species)
well-mixed community (spatial distribution of each species is random)
individuals are sampled at random (brighter colored individuals aren't sampled more often than others)
sampling with identical methods (if used to compare two communities)
E(Sm)≈S−S∑i=1(1−pi)m
where S is the number of species, m is the total number of individuals in the sample, and pi is the proportion of species i in the original sample.
Sest=Sobs+((f1)22f2)
If a sample of an ecological community results in the following abundances of species, what is the estimated overall richness of the community? Sp A (200 individuals), Sp B (140 individuals), Sp C (98 individuals), Sp D (30 individuals), Sp E (2 individuals), Sp F (2 individuals), Sp G (1 individual), Sp H (1 individual).
A. 8
B. 9
C. 10
D. 11

Which community is more diverse??
Richness is an uninformative descriptor: equal weight given to rare and abundant species
The typical pattern of abundances of different species of a single group in the same area:



Given the commonness of rarity, how to measure community diversity?
Two different things going on:
Two potential solutions:
Balancing Richness and Abundance/Evenness
H′=−S∑i=1pilnpi Where: pi = proportion of the total sample represented by species i, ln = log base e, S = the number of species in the community
H′=−∑Si=1pilnpi

| Species | Abundance | Pi | ln(Pi) | Pi x ln(Pi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow | 17 | |||
| Orange | 1 | |||
| Purple | 1 | |||
| Brown | 1 | |||
| Total | 20 | 1 |
H' = ?
| Species | Abundance | Pi | ln(Pi) | Pi x ln(Pi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow | 5 | |||
| Orange | 5 | |||
| Purple | 5 | |||
| Brown | 5 | |||
| Total | 20 | 1 |
H' = ?
Index Higher when species more evenly distributed

What is the Shannon Index of Diversity for the following community?
A. 0
B. 1
C. 2.83
D. 17
Prop = 1, and ln1 = 0. Therefore, it’s 0.
Weakness
Can’t tell if differences in measurements are due to richness or evenness (or can you?)
Difference between 0.58 & 1.39. What does it mean?
When all species are equally abundant: H′=ln(4)=1.39: Community B has max diversity
Evenness E = H'/H'max

Slope ≈ evenness; Length ≈ richness
Slope ≈ evenness; Length ≈ richness.
Most species are moderately abundant; few are very abundant or extremely rare

Jaccard similarity:
J(A,B)=|A∩B||A∪B|
|A∩B| is the shared species between communities A and B, while |A∪B| is the total number of shared and non-shared species.
Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data
It reviewed 24 such measures!
A common observation: communities which are farther apart tend to be more dissimilar than two communities which are close together


Changes in taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity in the Anthropocene

Community composition describes the diversity and identity of species within a given community
keystone species is a species that has a large impact on community structure relative to it's abundance / biomass in the community (e.g., top predator)
foundation species is a species that can play a substantial role in determining what species can exist within the community (e.g., beavers, earthworms). Usually, this is a species that defines much of the structure of a community through e.g., habitat-forming
Community assembly is the set of processes by which communities are formed
Whereas the figure is drawn as if these processes occur sequentially, in reality they occur more-or-less simultaneously or in any order
Succession – directional change in community composition at a site (as opposed to simple fluctuations), initiated by natural or anthropogenic disturbance, stress, or the creation of a new site
Some biologists restrict the definition to directional replacement of species after disturbance
Disturbance – a discrete event that damages or kills residents on a site (and potentially creates opportunities for other individuals to grow or reproduce); either catastrophic or non-catastrophic (Platt & Connell 2003 Ecological Monographs)
Stress – factor that reduces growth, reproduction, or survival of individuals (and potentially creates opportunities for other individuals)
Intensity & Severity (how much damage & death?); Frequency (how often?); Extent (how much area was affected?)

Primary Succession – succession that occurs after the creation of a “blank slate,” either through catastrophic disturbance or de novo creation of a new site

Secondary Succession – succession that occurs after non-catastrophic disturbance (including “old fields”)

One of the world’s most rapid and extensive glacial retreats in modern times (so far); eliminated ~2500 km2 of ice in ~200 yr, exposing large expanses of nutrient-poor boulder till to biotic colonization

Reconstructed patterns of stand development at several sites within the chronosequence;
intensively analyzed tree-rings


Species richness generally increased with successional age (a common pattern in succession studies, even though at times a mid-succession peak is observed)



Henry Chandler Cowles (1869-1939)
Lake Michigan sand dunes – late 1800s
Concluded that sites on the dunes were older further inland, i.e., formed a “chronosequence” (also space-for-time substitution) from which temporal change could be inferred
Referred to distinct plant assemblages as “societies”

Radical, “superorganism” view of communities; species interact and act en masse to promote a directed pattern of community development through “seral” (intermediate) stages, ending in a “climax” community
“individualistic view of succession” in which “every species is a law unto itself”

Our modern population-biology view derives primarily from Gleason’s conceptual model, even though Clementsian ideas of deterministic progression through seral to climax stages dominated ecological theory well into the 20th century
Announcements
Keyboard shortcuts
| ↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
| ↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
| Home | Go to first slide |
| End | Go to last slide |
| Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
| b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
| c | Clone slideshow |
| p | Toggle presenter mode |
| t | Restart the presentation timer |
| ?, h | Toggle this help |
| Esc | Back to slideshow |