Announcements
Macroecology is a way of studying relationships between organisms and their environment that involves characterizing and explaining statistical patterns of abundance, distribution, and diversity. Jim Brown 1995
the prefix "macro" for two reasons. 1) in order to characterize patterns in the statistical distributions of variables among individuals, populations, or species, it is usually necessary to work at relatively large spatial and/or temporal scales so as to obtain sufficiently large samples. 2) in order to investigate the implications of important advances in other disciplines such as biogeography, paleo-biology, systematics, and the earth sciences, it is necessary to expand the scale of ecological research.
Macroecology differs from most of recent and current ecology in its emphasis on statistical pattern analysis rather than experimental manipulation
McGill, Brian J. "The what, how and why of doing macroecology." Global Ecology and Biogeography 28.1 (2019): 6-17.
How large is large enough? Extent? Grain?
The dimensionality of macroecology. Figure taken from McGill (2019) https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12855.
Macroecology is a big-picture, statistical approach to the study of ecology. By focusing on broadly occurring patterns and processes operating at large spatial and temporal scales and ignoring localized and fine-scaled details, macroecology aims to uncover general mechanisms operating at organism, population and ecosystem levels of organization. Smith et al. 2008
In the reductionist view, adequate modelling of the components should always reproduce all emergent phenomena.
The transmutation problem: scaling up is challenging because of Jensen's inequality (the average of a function is not the function of the average) ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯f(xi)≠f(¯¯¯¯¯xi)
the claim that macroecology can be explained by individuals and population dynamics can be demonstrated rigorously to be possible only rarely, owing to the transmutation problem
Species richness
Species Range
Body size
Abundance
It attempts to explain the colonization and extinction of species (and subsequently the species richness of islands) as a function of island area and distance from the mainland
Early naturalist-explorers noted that large islands hold more species than small islands
Apply theory to terrestrial (or aquatic) patches.
Vegetation patterns across the landscape (patches) suggest islands of different sizes
Equilibrium species richness (S) is affected by the distance of the island from the mainland, and size of the island
19.13The number of species established on an island represents a dynamic equilibrium between the immigration of new colonizing species and the extinction of previously established ones Species on the mainland are the possible colonists to an uninhabited island The species with the greatest dispersal ability will be the first to colonize the island The immigration rate will decline as the number of species on the island increases Few “new” species left to colonize The immigration rate will be zero when all mainland species exist on the island
“A patch of habitat isolated from similar habitat by inhospitable terrain may be considered an island”
This pattern of increasing species diversity from the poles to the tropics is remarkably consistent across numerous marine and terrestrial taxa (plants, fish, birds, mammals, and many invertebrate groups) and has also persisted across much of both modern and deep time.
Distribution of extant terrestrial vertebrate species showing the high concentration of diversity in equatorial regions
Speciation and extinction rates determine species richness
Climate: high solar energy, low seasonality --> high productivity --> high species richness (recall foodweb)
Historical: more time, less perturbed in the past by climatic events, accumulating species over time
Geographic: larger and more heterogeneous areas in tropics
Mid-domain effect: bounded geographical domain + random shifting species ranges --> mid-domain peak of species richness. Null models
Speciation and extinction rates determine species richness
Climate: high solar energy, low seasonality --> high productivity --> high species richness (recall foodweb)
Historical: more time, less perturbed in the past by climatic events, accumulating species over time
Geographic: larger and more heterogeneous areas in tropics
Mid-domain effect: bounded geographical domain + random shifting species ranges --> mid-domain peak of species richness. Null models
Not mutually exclusive
Speciation and extinction rates determine species richness
Climate: high solar energy, low seasonality --> high productivity --> high species richness (recall foodweb)
Historical: more time, less perturbed in the past by climatic events, accumulating species over time
Geographic: larger and more heterogeneous areas in tropics
Mid-domain effect: bounded geographical domain + random shifting species ranges --> mid-domain peak of species richness. Null models
Not mutually exclusive
Elevational gradient
If species' ranges are randomly shuffled within a bounded geographical domain free of environmental gradients, ranges overlap increasingly toward the center of the domain, creating a “mid‐domain” peak of species richness.
Rapoport's rule: the tendency for species living at higher latitudes to have larger range sizes
Bergmann's rule: the tendency for a positive association between the body mass of species in a monophyletic higher taxon and the latitude inhabited by those species.
Phylogeny I : Random ancestral colonization by a large-bodied species Phylogeny II: Selective advantage of traits which are accidentally coupled with large body size Dispersal ability: Small body mass is associated with low dispersal ability Heat conservation: Increased heat conservation of large-bodied species; the higher surface area to volume ratio of smaller individuals results in improved heat dissipation in hot environments Starvation resistance: Increased starvation resistance of large-bodied species
Riemer, Kristina, Robert P. Guralnick, and Ethan P. White. "No general relationship between mass and temperature in endothermic species." Elife 7 (2018): e27166.
The species abundance distribution (SAD) characterizes the distribution of abundances of all species within a sample or ecological community.
Rare species are common; common species are rare
The species abundance distribution (SAD) characterizes the distribution of abundances of all species within a sample or ecological community.
Rare species are common; common species are rare
Species richness and evenness
Understanding the abundance and distribution of species is arguably one of the most fundamental goals of ecology.
The abundant center hypothesis states that species density should be highest in the center of species range
Dallas, T. A., Santini, L., Decker, R., & Hastings, A. (2020). Weighing the Evidence for the Abundant-Center Hypothesis. Biodiversity Informatics, 15(3), 81-91.
Announcements
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |